Class-action settlement big victory for athletes
Class Action News
The suit argued that restricting a scholarship to the cost of tuition, books, housing and meals was an unlawful restraint of trade because of the billions of dollars the NCAA earned through broadcast and licensing deals. NCAA general counsel Elsa Cole said she expects the court to approve the agreement.
The settlement says the $10 million will be made available over a period of three years to qualifying student-athletes — which the NCAA says could number 12,000 — to reimburse them for "bona fide educational expenses hereafter incurred, such as tuition, fees, books, supplies and equipment."
An NCAA study estimated athletes on full scholarships averaged $2,500 a year in out-of-pocket expenses. The settlement allows athletes to apply for as much as $2,500 a year for up to three years.
Cole said the $10 million will come from the NCAA's reserve fund. "That's money that's been set aside for emergency uses or unanticipated contingencies … maybe something like this," she said.
Stephen Morrissey, who represented White in the case said, "We think $2,500 is a significant chunk of the educational cost.
"We wanted terms defined as broadly as we could so even a kid who didn't graduate could pursue something like culinary school if he wants to, and this can allow him to get reimbursed. And teachers can pursue continuing education."
Morrissey said the case got within "a couple of months" of trial.
"This was a hard-fought case," he said. "They have really good lawyers, and a lot of them, and they were fighting every step of the way."
Athletes also will have easier access to another $218 million of existing funds with the settlement.
Related listings
-
Dannon Company Refutes Class Action Lawsuit
Class Action News 01/28/2008Yogurt company The Dannon Company has refuted the class-action lawsuit filed against it in Los Angeles, California. The company has said the complaint does not have any support for the generalizations made in the lawsuit and the publication cited in ...
-
Class-action status approved in suit against Dow
Class Action News 01/26/2008[##_1L|1111424567.jpg|width="130" height="92" alt=""|_##]A citizen lawsuit alleging damages caused by contamination from Dow Chemical Co. should become a class action, the Michigan Court of Appeals said in a decision released Friday. Those who sued t...
-
GE attorney's class action lawsuit to go forward
Class Action News 01/25/2008A high-ranking attorney for General Electric Co. can go ahead with her class-action lawsuit against what she calls the "very male-dominated culture" in the international conglomerate, a federal judge has ruled. U.S. District Judge Peter Dorsey on Wed...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.