Court refuses to hear medical marijuana challenges
Court Alerts
The Supreme Court won't hear another challenge to California's decade-old law permitting marijuana use for medical purposes.
The high court on Monday refused to hear appeals from San Diego and San Bernardino counties, which say the justices have never directly ruled on whether California's law trumps the federal controlled substances laws.
Supporters say marijuana helps chronically ill patients relieve pain. Critics say the drug has no medical benefit and all use should be illegal.
San Diego supervisors had sued to overturn the state law after it was approved by voters in 1996, but lower courts have ruled against them.
San Diego and San Bernardino counties argued that issuing identification cards to eligible users, as required by the 1996 state law, would violate federal law, which does not recognize the state measure.
A federal appeals court ruled that ID card laws "do not pose a significant impediment" to the federal Controlled Substances Act because that law is designed to "combat recreational drug use, not to regulate a state's medical practices."
The cases are County of San Bernardino v. California, 08-897 and County of San Diego v. San Diego NORML, 08-887.
Related listings
-
Court turns away appeal over Steinbeck copyrights
Court Alerts 05/18/2009The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a son of author John Steinbeck over the publishing rights to "The Grapes of Wrath" and other early works. The court said Monday it won't disturb a ruling by the federal appeals court in New York that the ri...
-
Appeals court sides with Redskins over trademark
Court Alerts 05/16/2009A federal appeals court is siding with the Washington Redskins against a group of American Indians who say the football team's trademark is racially offensive. The decision issued Friday by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington doesn't address the ...
-
3 plead not guilty in Anna Nicole Smith drug case
Court Alerts 05/14/2009Anna Nicole Smith's lawyer-turned-boyfriend and two doctors pleaded not guilty Wednesday to charges they conspired to provide thousands of prescription pills to the former model before her overdose death two years ago. The appearance of Howard K. Ste...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.