Pa. panel hears testimony in court kickbacks case
Court Alerts
A judge tasked with unraveling an alleged $2.8 million kickback scheme involving two Pennsylvania judges says they presided over a juvenile justice system "run amok."
Senior Bucks County Judge Arthur Grim told a state investigatory panel Monday that former Judge Mark Ciavarella (shiv-uh-REL'-uh) sentenced juvenile offenders to jail without exploring the charges against them.
Grim's testimony follows his review of thousands of cases after the scandal came to light.
Ciavarella and former Luzerne County Judge Michael Conahan are accused of accepting payoffs from two private juvenile detention centers.
The state Supreme Court last month threw out thousands of juvenile cases that came before Ciavarella. It said none of the young offenders got a fair hearing.
Related listings
-
Court won't review Lake Conroe capital case
Court Alerts 11/09/2009The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to review the case of a Montgomery County man condemned for shooting a woman and dumping her body in a lake so he could steal her red convertible. Michael James “Romeo” Perry was convicted of the slaying of 50-year-...
-
Gambler lawsuit heads to the Supreme Court
Court Alerts 11/09/2009Should a casino be held responsible for a compulsive gambler who lost $135,000 in a single night?It's now up to the Indiana Supreme Court.Jenny Kephart says Ceasars Indiana enticed her to gamble with free meals, rooms and money on credit.The casino s...
-
Mich. man wins appeal to get name off sex registry
Court Alerts 11/05/2009The Michigan Court of Appeals says a man who had a teenage romance with a girl he later married doesn't deserve to be on the state's sex offender list.Robert Dipiazza had a consensual relationship when he was 18 with a nearly 15-year-old in 2004. A t...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.