Court to decide Miranda warning expansion

Headline News

The Supreme Court will decide whether a suspect has to be told that he has a right to have a lawyer present during questioning by police.


The court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal from Kevin Dwayne Powell, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

When he was arrested, police gave Powell his Miranda warnings, including telling him he had a right to a lawyer before questioning. Powell's lawyers objected, saying police did not tell him he had a right to have a lawyer during his police interrogation.

The Florida Supreme Court overturned the conviction, saying the police's Miranda warning was insufficient.

Related listings

  • Lawyer's gambling with client funds came up lemons

    Lawyer's gambling with client funds came up lemons

    Headline News 06/22/2009

    A disbarred New Jersey lawyer is headed to state prison for 15 years for blowing $4 million of his clients' money in Atlantic City. Michael P. Rumore, 50, who ran his law practice from the basement of his Lyndhurst home, was supposed to use the money...

  • Nationwide, public defender offices are in crisis

    Nationwide, public defender offices are in crisis

    Headline News 06/04/2009

    It wasn't the brightest decision she'd ever made. She admits that. But if she'd had enough money to hire a lawyer she might not have lost six months of her life. Kimberly Hurrell-Harring, a certified nursing assistant and mother of two, had driven 7 ...

  • Bankruptcy law firm calls GM home

    Bankruptcy law firm calls GM home

    Headline News 05/29/2009

    General Motors Corp.'s primary bankruptcy law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is housed in New York in the aptly named GM building. In June 2008, a group of investors purchased the iconic building on Fifth Avenue and three others in a $4 billion ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read