Firm suspends lawyer in school district scandal
Headline News
A part-time private attorney who was listed as a full-time employee by five school districts - enabling him to earn health benefits and a nearly $62,000-a-year state-funded pension, while his law firm was paid millions of dollars in fees - has been suspended by his current law firm, one of its partners said yesterday.
Steven Schlesinger, a partner in the Garden City law firm of Jaspan, Schlesinger, Hoffman, said yesterday that his firm had suspended Lawrence Reich and asked for his resignation. Reich had been serving as of counsel, or as a consultant, to the law firm since Jan. 1.
"Based on the publicity, it's not any good to have him at the firm," Schlesinger said. "I don't need P.R. liabilities."
He added, however, "I don't think any laws were violated."
Schlesinger said the firm has not heard from Reich since the disclosures. "We're trying to locate him."
Reich, who lives in Centerport, did not return a call for comment yesterday. In an earlier interview, he defended his arrangement with the five districts as "common practice."
At the same time that the districts claimed Reich as an employee, they paid his then-law firm, Ingerman Smith of Hauppauge, more than $2.5 million in fees, according to district records. Under Internal Revenue Service rules, a person cannot be treated as both an employee and independent contractor for the same work.
After the Newsday story appeared, agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation served all five districts with subpoenas for financial records.
In addition, the
Reich retired with an annual pension of $61,459 in September 2006. But he continued working for some of the districts, according to letters he sent asking them to "reconfigure" his pay as a retainer, rather than as a salary.
Last July, state auditors uncovered the problem in an audit of the Harborfields school district. Reich said he then contacted the state about his pension eligibility and was assured it was common practice.
The state took no action, and the issue was not included in the final audit of Harborfields.
Nonetheless, Reich notified the districts that he was retiring for good in October.
In December, Ingerman Smith notified the districts that Reich was leaving the firm.
Related listings
-
Five districts falsely reported lawyer's job status
Headline News 02/17/2008A federal grand jury in Central Islip has opened an investigation into possible fraudulent financial double-dipping at five Long Island school districts, according to several sources. Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation served subpoenas f...
-
‘Hottest Female Associate’ Contest Leaves Skadden Unamused
Headline News 02/13/2008Who’s the hottest young female lawyer at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom? Last week that question sent the New York firm into a bit of a tizzy.On Feb. 4, Skadden Insider, a blog written by two anonymous firm employees and dedicated, unoffici...
-
Feds: Terror trial prosecutor shouldn't collect legal fees
Headline News 02/12/2008A former prosecutor lied about achievements on his resume and shouldn't collect legal fees for defending himself against charges from a botched terrorism trial, federal authorities say.A jury in October acquitted Richard Convertino of accusations tha...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.