Law Firm Urges SEC To Be Aggressive In Attacking Rumors
Headline News
U.S. securities regulators need to be more aggressive in attacking manipulative rumor-mongering and short selling abuses, a prominent New York law firm said Monday.
In a memo to clients, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz urged the Securities and Exchange Commission to conduct a 45-day study of the extent to which "abusive and manipulative short-selling and spreading of false rumors is taking place," and to issue a public report on its findings.
The law firm also called for the SEC to adopt rules as appropriate in response to its findings, and to bring enforcement actions against wrongdoers, coordinating efforts with criminal prosecutors where necessary.
Wachtell, Lipton's call to arms came one day after an unusual Sunday announcement from the SEC that it plans to begin immediate examinations into controls at brokerage firms, mutual funds, money management companies and hedge funds to prevent the deliberate spreading of false rumors to manipulate stock prices.
The SEC's examination into industry practices came after a rocky week of trading and concerns about the outlook for federal housing-finance giants Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) and for commercial and investment banks, including Lehman Brothers Inc. (LEH).
"While this is an important first step, the SEC needs to undertake additional bold measures to constrain abusive short-selling and rumor-mongering," according to the memo, signed by Wachtell, Lipton partners Edward Herlihy and Theodore Levine. The two recently urged the SEC to bring back restrictions on short sales when stock prices are declining, recommending a return to so-called "tick test" that forbade short sales when markets are ticking down.
SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment.
Wachtell, Lipton is a leading advisor in corporate mergers, including the acquisition of Bear Stearns Cos. by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Some former Bear executives have blamed the firm's collapse on market manipulation by short sellers and JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Jamie Dimon recently said that the SEC should investigate whether Bear was brought down by a smear campaign.
Short sellers sell borrow shares in hopes of replacing them later at a lower price, profiting when the stock declines. While the practice is legal, critics say regulators have been ineffective in curbing abusive, manipulative short selling.
Related listings
-
Ages of Supreme Court justices and recent retirees
Headline News 07/13/2008The members of the Supreme Court, by age:John Paul Stevens, 88Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 75Antonin Scalia, 72Anthony Kennedy, 71Stephen Breyer, 69David Souter, 68Clarence Thomas, 60Samuel Alito, 58John Roberts, 53The last 10 justices to leave the Supreme C...
-
GOAA member's firm target of lawsuit
Headline News 07/09/2008A class-action lawsuit filed June 26 in U.S. District Court in Miami accuses an Orlando law firm founded by a member of the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority of racketeering by sending threatening letters that demand money from alleged shoplifters. ...
-
After DC gun ban overturned, city seeks new rules
Headline News 07/07/2008Dale Metta, who manages a gun shop just outside the District of Columbia limits in Maryland, has had to turn away dozens of city residents wanting to buy handguns in recent days. Never mind that the U.S. Supreme Court just struck down Washington's 32...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.