Lerach admits role in kickback scheme
Headline News
[##_1L|1386554067.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]William Lerach, the lead attorney in a New York-based law firm that lodged a $1 billion class-action against the CNMI industry, has pleaded guilty to a criminal indictment filed in Los Angeles, California. According to a Washington Post report, the 61-year-old Lerach agreed to plead guilty to a charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Lerach also agreed to pay the U.S. government fines and penalties of $8 million.
The report stated that under the terms of the plea, the lawyer will serve at least one year and no more than two years in federal prison. The plea agreement requires court approval, the report added.
The guilty plea deal ends a seven-year investigation into allegations that Lerach and his former law firm, Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP, secretly paid people to serve as plaintiffs.
“I have always fought for my clients aggressively and vigorously in order to hold powerful corporations responsible when their actions harmed people,” said Lerach in a statement that was included in the Washington Post article.
Lerach said he regrettably crossed a line and pushed too far.
“For my actions, I apologize and accept full responsibility for my conduct,” he said.
According to a May 16, 2006 Wall Street Journal article, a New Jersey businessman pleaded guilty of taking secret payments as a plaintiff in Milberg class-action lawsuits between 1991 and 2005.
The businessman's guilty plea reportedly caused two top partners of Milberg to leave the law firm.
Milberg is known for filing shareholder class-action lawsuits in which investors go against corporate management with big money at stake.
In 2005, Milberg reportedly sued at least 75 companies for securities fraud. In 2004 and 2005, the law firm reportedly settled 90 cases and extracted more than $1.5 billion from investors.
In January 1999, Milberg and other law firms, on behalf of some garment workers, sued several garment factories on Saipan, alleging that workers were made to work in sweatshop conditions.
The garment owners branded the lawsuit as “embellished and unreal.”
After a costly litigations, the class-suit was settled in the U.S. District Court for the NMI. The combined settlement fund reportedly reaches close to $20 million. A total of $8.75 million went to plaintiffs' lawyers.
Related listings
-
Two big Missouri law firms in preliminary merger talks
Headline News 09/18/2007Two of Missouri’s biggest law firms - Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin and Husch & Eppenberger - are engaged in preliminary merger talks, both firms confirmed Monday.The combination of the two would create a firm with 630 attorneys, ranking it seco...
-
Law firms rethinking retirement age
Headline News 09/14/2007How old is too old?That's an issue facing lawyers across the country as the American Bar Association and state organizations consider proposals to eliminate mandatory retirement ages at many of the biggest and most prestigious law firms. Force...
-
Restaurant group lauds N.Y. court decision
Headline News 09/13/2007The Washington Restaurant Association, which opposes King County's plan to mandate that chain restaurants label their menus with nutritional information, is lauding a New York court decision that essentially strikes down a similar plan. In U.S. Distr...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.