Supreme Court to look at gun law
Headline News
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
That's what the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment says. Last week the Supreme Court agreed to decide what it means. It could be the most far-reaching decision on guns in almost 70 years.
That's when the high court rejected the notion of an individual right to possess guns for purposes unrelated to state militias. That 1939 decision allowed room for the federal government, the states and the District of Columbia to regulate and restrict gun ownership, and that has frustrated gun-rights advocates ever since. The case the court agreed to hear next March challenges D.C.'s 31-year-old handgun ban.
The Supreme Court shouldn't reverse this settled law.
A ruling that establishes a precedent for an individual's constitutional right to possess guns would open the floodgates and drown the courts in challenges of the existing, rational restrictions on gun ownership. And a sweeping decision could mean that the nation would soon be awash in ever more firearms.
With an estimated 192 million privately owned guns already in the country, that we don't need.
Related listings
-
Enron law firm seeks $700 million in fees
Headline News 11/26/2007[##_1L|1080190606.jpg|width="130" height="130" alt=""|_##]A law firm is asking a federal judge to approve nearly $700 million in legal fees for its efforts to help Enron Corp. shareholders and investors recoup billions they lost after the once-mighty...
-
If you fail to pay, law firm will come calling
Headline News 11/26/2007If you refuse to pay your property taxes in Dallas County, chances are you're going to hear from a lawyer. And the chances are even greater that lawyer will be from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson. Dallas County and most of its cities and other...
-
When joining a rival firm, watch out for legal traps
Headline News 11/13/2007Ready to join a rival, you urge several subordinates and clients to come along. You assume you're safe because you lack a noncompete agreement.Big mistake. Your poaching attempt may bring you big trouble. A growing number of companies sue job hoppers...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.