Microsoft Faces New Antitrust Class Action In Arizona

Lawyer Blogs

[##_1L|1360585945.jpg|width="130" height="93" alt=""|_##]A local governing body near Phoenix, Arizona has slapped Microsoft (MSFT) with a class action lawsuit, citing antitrust claims similar to those that resulted in a series of multi-million dollar settlements between Microsoft and consumers in more than a dozen states beginning in 2004. Arizona's Daisy Mountain Fire District, a political sub-division, said it's reviving the claims because the existing settlements do not apply to government agencies. The Fire District said in court documents that it wants to recover "overpayments made to Microsoft for its operating systems, word processing and spreadsheet applications software." It's also seeking triple damages and court costs.

The Fire District charges Microsoft with engaging in "anticompetitive and monopolistic practices" and is seeking a jury trial. Attorneys for the Fire District are asking the court to open the case to all governing bodies in Arizona, giving it class action status.

The Fire District quietly filed the claim earlier this summer in Arizona state court in Maricopa County. Last week, Microsoft asked the federal U.S. District Court for Arizona to take over the case.

The Fire District is repeating many of the claims made against Microsoft by the Department of Justice and attorneys general on behalf of consumers in 19 states and the District of Columbia. The allegations center on charges that Microsoft used its monopoly position to overcharge for software applications such as word processors and spreadsheets. Under the settlements, Microsoft has agreed to issue millions of dollars worth of product vouchers to affected buyers.

Microsoft officials were not immediately available for comment.

Word of the action comes as Microsoft faces ongoing antitrust scrutiny in Europe. On Monday, Europe's second highest court rejected Microsoft's appeal of almost $1 billion in fines imposed on the company by trustbusters at the European Commission.

Related listings

  • Suspects in W.Va. Torture Set for Court

    Suspects in W.Va. Torture Set for Court

    Lawyer Blogs 09/16/2007

    [##_1L|1154244621.jpg|width="120" height="80" alt=""|_##]Six white people accused of holding a black woman captive while they tortured and sexually assaulted her are scheduled to make their initial court appearances this week. But the proceedings may...

  • State high court to review ruling on churches

    State high court to review ruling on churches

    Lawyer Blogs 09/13/2007

    [##_1L|1358712279.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]The California Supreme Court has voted unanimously to review a recent appeals court ruling that the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles is the owner of the buildings, prayer books and other prope...

  • Court puts hold on Qualcomm import ban

    Court puts hold on Qualcomm import ban

    Lawyer Blogs 09/13/2007

    [##_1L|1113198582.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]South Korean handset makers on Thursday welcomed a US appeals court ruling that halted an import ban on mobile phones containing Qualcomm’s 3G chipsets, a legal victory in the chipmaker’s paten...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read