EU bans misleading "sunblock" labels
Legal World
There is no such thing as 100 percent protection from the sun, the European Union's consumer chief warned holidaymakers on Monday and she banned the words "sunblock" and "100 percent sun protection" on sun cream.
Such labeling is misleading and contributes to thousands of deaths each year, Consumer Protection Commissioner Meglena Kuneva said.
"Consumers need clear, accurate information on sunscreen products so they can make informed choices," she said in a statement.
"There is no such thing as 100 percent protection and we need to reinforce that essential message. This is just one of a number of measures that are necessary for effective protection against the sun."
According to Cancer Research UK, the number of skin cancer cases in that country has more than doubled since the early 1980s with over 2,000 deaths from skin cancer each year.
Under the new rules, which came into force on Monday and will be phased in before the end of the year, the new labels will also include a new UVA logo and standardized terms such as "low," "medium," "high" and "very high" protection.
UVA is the term used for ultraviolet light that can cause chronic conditions such as the appearance of aging and interferes with the human immune system.
UVB radiation is the cause of sunburn, but damages only the skin's outer layer or epidermis. Although both types of radiation are important contributors to the risk of skin cancer, experts believe UVA plays a bigger role.
The Commission said sunscreen products with only UVB protection may provide a false sense of safety because they do not protect against UVA radiation.
As labels for 2007 have already been printed, around 20 percent of sunscreen products on the shelves will feature the new labels.
"So for the moment consumers are advised to read labels very carefully during this summer," Kuneva said.
Related listings
-
Farnham's manager pleads guilty to tax scam
Legal World 07/06/2007John Farnham's manager Glenn Wheatley has pleaded guilty to three tax-related charges.The 59-year-old admitted not declaring his $256,000 income from Farnham's Talk of the Town Tour. The court heard Wheatley paid it into a Swiss-based tax minimisatio...
-
Google Loses Court Battle Over Gmail in Germany
Legal World 07/05/2007A young German entrepreneur won a legal battle Thursday against Internet behemoth Google on the use of its "Gmail" brand for free electronic mail service.The regional court in the northern city of Hamburg ruled that Google may not use the name in Ger...
-
Bank of New York Fails to Appear in Russian Court
Legal World 07/05/2007The Moscow Arbitration Court heard opening arguments today regarding the Russian Federation's $22.5 billion claim against The Bank of New York, Inc., now the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation , for money laundering activities the Bank had previousl...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child.
Forte Law Group is one of only a very few law firms within the state of Connecticut that is dedicated to exclusively representing families and children with special needs.
Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.