Rush to Hang Hussein Was Questioned
Legal World
[##_1L|1145756606.jpg|width="150" height="122" alt=""|_##]The unruly nature of the weekend hanging of Saddam Hussein as especially revealed by a grainy but graphic camera phone video taken at the scene prompted protest and disavowal Monday as Sunnis condemned the treatment of the ousted Iraqi president and angry American officials in Iraq sought to distance themselves from events as they actually unfolded. In Amman, Jordan, hundreds of demonstrators gathered at a memorial rally addressed by Raghad Hussein, Saddam's eldest daughter who had orchestrated her father's legal defense and who called him a "martyr" as Saddam loyalists decried the execution as "government by revenge." In Damascus, Syrian Information Minister Mosen Bilal, whose government is dominated by another branch of the Baath Party that ruled Iraq under Saddam, said "the terrifying images of the execution of Saddam Hussein are a violation of the most basic principles and international agreements" and expressed dismay that the execution was carried out on the first day of the Muslim Eid holiday. The Sydney Morning Herald has more.
Meanwhile the New York Times cited anonymous American officials as being "privately incensed" at how Saddam's hanging had been rushed forward in the dead of night early Saturday local time at the insistence of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and other top officials. The US officials indicated that they had been concerned with the legal process leading up to the execution, in particular the status of the constitutional requirement that a death warrant be approved by Iraq's president and vice-president, which created a problem as President Jalal Talabani, an opponent of the death penalty, refused to sign any warrant himself. A panel of Iraqi judges ultimately ruled that the constitutional provision was void in the context of the law governing the sentence handed down by the Iraqi High Tribunal, but the process was rushed. American officials also told the Times they had been concerned about the timing of the execution at the beginning of the Eid holiday.
The Times said that although the Americans had acknowledged that the execution of Saddam was an Iraqi matter, their reticence about the whole process was only heightened by the eventual video revelations of the confused and undignified manner in which it was finally conducted.
Related listings
-
Legal age for buying tobacco to rise in Britain
Legal World 01/01/2007Britain is raising the legal age to purchase tobacco from 16 to 18 years, the government announced Monday.The new age limit is aimed at helping retailers to spot underage smokers, and making it more difficult for young people to begin smoking, the go...
-
World leaders divided on Saddam execution
Legal World 12/30/2006[##_1L|1065182971.jpg|width="156" height="125" alt=""|_##]World political and religious leaders were divided Saturday in their reaction to the execution of Saddam Hussein. In a statement released from his ranch at Crawford, Texas, late Friday night E...
-
Iraqi court confirms Saddam Hussein’s death sentence
Legal World 12/27/2006[##_1L|1073398746.jpg|width="200" height="148" alt=""|_##]The confirmation yesterday of the death sentence against Saddam Hussein is the final act in a legal charade directed from Washington. The Iraqi Appeal Court upheld the verdict against Hussein ...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.