Swiss voters reject anti-immigration initiative
Legal World
Swiss voters overwhelmingly rejected an anti-immigrant initiative that would have made it harder for foreigners to gain citizenship, according to referendum results released Sunday.
All but one of 26 Swiss cantons (states) rejected the initiative by the nationalistic Swiss People's Party, while in the overall population 63.8 percent voted against it, according to official results.
The initiative was aimed at overturning a Supreme Court ruling that barred the widely denounced practice in some Swiss communities of subjecting citizenship applications to a popular vote.
"The people clearly said: 'We don't want xenophobia and we want direct democracy to respect basic rights,'" Swiss President Pascal Couchepin said on Swiss television SF.
People's Party lawmaker Hans Fehr said he still believed the requirements for Swiss citizenship should be more stringent.
Related listings
-
Son of India politician sentenced to life in prison
Legal World 05/30/2008A New Delhi court sentenced a wealthy Indian politician's son to life in prison Friday for the murder of his sister's boyfriend in a case seen as a test of the justice system's ability to take on the powerful.Earlier in the week the court convicted V...
-
World Court gives lighthouse island to Singapore
Legal World 05/23/2008The International Court of Justice on Friday awarded Singapore sovereignty over a disputed island at the eastern entrance of the Singapore Straits.The two-acre island hosts a strategic lighthouse that has been a landmark for 150 years and a beacon of...
-
Iraqi court resumes trial of Saddam lieutenant
Legal World 05/20/2008An Iraqi court has resumed hearing the case against Tariq Aziz and seven other former regime officials who face charges in the 1992 execution of dozens of merchants.Aziz, 72, is the former deputy prime minister and one of Saddam Hussein's best-known ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.