Law firm appeals ruling on campaign donations
Headline News
The Philadelphia law firm to which U.S. Rep. Bob Brady owes nearly half a million dollars has appealed a judge's ruling that threw out its suit against the city Board of Ethics.
Cozen O'Connor has asked Commonwealth Court to reconsider its argument that the Ethics Board is wrong in requiring that donations to Brady's mayoral campaign committee, for the purpose of retiring his debt, comply with the city's limits on donor contributions.
Brady incurred nearly $450,000 in legal fees during his successful fight to stay on the ballot during last year's mayoral primary. He would be able to pay that debt off faster and easier if donors now were permitted to exceed the city caps in that race, which were $5,000 per individual, and $20,000 per political committee.
But in a ruling last month, Common Pleas Court Judge Gary F. DiVito dismissed Cozen O'Connor's lawsuit, saying the firm lacked the legal standing to challenge the city law
Related listings
-
SEC settles two lawsuits against Coppell man
Headline News 07/16/2008The Securities and Exchange Commission settled two civil lawsuits Tuesday against a North Texas stock promoter allegedly involved in so-called pump-and-dump market manipulation scams. One suit is still pending against five other people and one compan...
-
Law Firm Urges SEC To Be Aggressive In Attacking Rumors
Headline News 07/15/2008U.S. securities regulators need to be more aggressive in attacking manipulative rumor-mongering and short selling abuses, a prominent New York law firm said Monday.In a memo to clients, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz urged the Securities and Exch...
-
Ages of Supreme Court justices and recent retirees
Headline News 07/13/2008The members of the Supreme Court, by age:John Paul Stevens, 88Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 75Antonin Scalia, 72Anthony Kennedy, 71Stephen Breyer, 69David Souter, 68Clarence Thomas, 60Samuel Alito, 58John Roberts, 53The last 10 justices to leave the Supreme C...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.