Venezuela asks UK court to lift Exxon asset freeze

Legal World

Venezuela's state oil company has asked a British court to lift a $12 billion freeze granted to U.S. oil major Exxon Mobil pending arbitration over the seizure of oil fields in the South American country.

Lawyers for PDVSA argued on Thursday that the court had no right to impose the freeze because the assets under dispute, the parties and the arbitration that Exxon has applied for were not in or connected with Britain.

Leftist President Hugo Chavez told foreign oil companies last year to cede a majority stake in oil projects or leave the country. Most agreed and accepted bids for stakes in their projects from PDVSA that analysts said were below market value. Exxon opted to pull out rather than concede and has applied for international arbitration to win damages.
Pending the outcome, America's largest company convinced courts in Britain, the United States and the Netherlands to freeze Venezuelan assets to ensure funds for compensation.

Acting for PDVSA, lawyer Gordon Pollock told the court, "It is not the role or function of the English courts to offer worldwide freezing orders" to anyone who asked for them.

Pollock said the English court had stretched beyond its jurisdiction in this instance given such asset freezes were normally only awarded in cases involving "egregious fraud".

"This is not a fraud case ... it is a contractual dispute." In Caracas, Venezuela's Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez said Venezuela made three basic arguments against the ruling.
First, the asset freeze was outside the arbitration process, which PDVSA was following in good faith. Second, PDVSA is a state company and therefore should be immune from such freezes, he said.

Finally, he said such freezes were used against companies in financial difficulties, which was not the case for PDVSA -- a company industry analysts believe can easily pay Exxon compensation for its seized assets.

Related listings

  • EU Court Rules on in Vitro Dispute

    EU Court Rules on in Vitro Dispute

    Legal World 02/26/2008

    [##_1L|1000813288.gif|width="115" height="75" alt=""|_##]The European Court of Justice, clarifying an Austrian labor dispute, ruled against a Salzburg woman's claim that she had been entitled to labor protection when she was fired while pursuing in v...

  • Raul Castro named Cuba's new president

    Raul Castro named Cuba's new president

    Legal World 02/25/2008

    Cuba's parliament named Raul Castro president to replace his ailing brother Fidel, prompting a guarded response Monday from countries looking for signs of reform on the Communist-ruled island.After years in Fidel's charismatic shadow as Cuba's number...

  • Serbs Protesters Attack UN Police

    Serbs Protesters Attack UN Police

    Legal World 02/22/2008

    Serbs protesting Kosovo's independence for a fifth straight day Friday attacked U.N. police guarding a key bridge in northern Kosovo with stones, glass bottles and firecrackers on Friday.Serbia's prime minister appealed for calm as the European Union...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

St Peters, MO Professional License Attorney Attorney John Lynch has been the go-to choice for many professionals facing administrative sanction. >> read